• x/vesting/types/tx.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go
• x/vesting/types/vesting.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go

• Makefile (1 hunks)
• cmd/axoned/cmd/genaccount.go (1 hunks)
• cmd/axoned/cmd/genaccount_test.go (1 hunks)
• cmd/axoned/cmd/root.go (1 hunks)
• docs/command/axoned_genesis_add-genesis-account.md (1 hunks)
• docs/command/axoned_tx_vesting_create-cliff-vesting-account.md (1 hunks)
• docs/command/axoned_tx_vesting_create-periodic-vesting-account.md (1 hunks)
• docs/proto/vesting.md (4 hunks)
• proto/buf.gen.doc.yml (1 hunks)
• proto/buf.yaml (1 hunks)
• proto/vesting/module/v1/module.proto (1 hunks)
• proto/vesting/v1beta1/tx.proto (4 hunks)
• proto/vesting/v1beta1/vesting.proto (6 hunks)
• scripts/protocgen-doc.sh (1 hunks)
• x/vesting/client/cli/test.json (1 hunks)
• x/vesting/client/cli/tx.go (14 hunks)
• x/vesting/client/cli/tx_test.go (1 hunks)
• x/vesting/module.go (5 hunks)
• x/vesting/msg_server.go (7 hunks)
• x/vesting/msg_server_test.go (14 hunks)
• x/vesting/types/codec.go (2 hunks)
• x/vesting/types/constants.go (1 hunks)
• x/vesting/types/genaccounts.go (1 hunks)
• x/vesting/types/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
• x/vesting/types/msgs.go (4 hunks)
• x/vesting/types/period.go (2 hunks)
• x/vesting/types/vesting_account.go (16 hunks)
• x/vesting/types/vesting_account_test.go (30 hunks)

• proto/vesting/v1beta1/tx.proto (no review received)
• x/vesting/types/genaccounts.go (no review received)
• x/vesting/client/cli/tx.go (no review received)
• x/vesting/msg_server.go (no review received)

• proto/buf.gen.doc.yml
• proto/buf.yaml
• x/vesting/client/cli/test.json
• x/vesting/types/constants.go
• x/vesting/types/msgs.go
• x/vesting/types/period.go

proto/vesting/module/v1/module.proto (1)

1-12: The protobuf definition for the vesting module configuration is correctly set up.

scripts/protocgen-doc.sh (1)

14-17: The updated script optimizes the search for .proto files and correctly handles the documentation generation and renaming.

x/vesting/types/genesis_test.go (1)

24-25: The test properly handles the new error response from NewBaseVestingAccount, ensuring robust error handling in genesis state validation.

x/vesting/types/codec.go (1)

23-27: The new vesting account types and messages are correctly registered, ensuring proper serialization and deserialization within the application.

Also applies to: 67-67

cmd/axoned/cmd/genaccount_test.go (1)

35-116: The tests for AddGenesisAccountCmd are comprehensive and correctly handle various scenarios, ensuring robust command validation.

cmd/axoned/cmd/genaccount.go (1)

33-104: Ensure proper error handling and command flag descriptions in AddGenesisAccountCmd.

Verification successful

Let's perform a detailed search for error handling and flag descriptions within the AddGenesisAccountCmd function.

---

Error Handling

The function includes error handling patterns:

• return err
• return fmt.Errorf("failed to get address from Keyring: %w", err)

These patterns indicate that errors are being properly caught and returned.

Command Flag Descriptions

The command flag descriptions are present:

• cmd.Flags().String(flags.FlagHome, defaultNodeHome, "The application home directory")
• cmd.Flags().String(flags.FlagKeyringBackend, flags.DefaultKeyringBackend, "Select keyring's backend (os|file|kwallet|pass|test)")
• cmd.Flags().String(flagVestingAmt, "", "amount of coins for vesting accounts")
• cmd.Flags().Int64(flagVestingStart, 0, "schedule start time (unix epoch) for vesting accounts")
• cmd.Flags().Int64(flagVestingCliff, 0, "schedule cliff time (unix epoch) for vesting accounts")
• cmd.Flags().Int64(flagVestingEnd, 0, "schedule end time (unix epoch) for vesting accounts")
• cmd.Flags().Bool(flagAppendMode, false, "append the coins to an account already in the genesis.json file")
• cmd.Flags().String(flagModuleName, "", "module account name")

These descriptions appear to be clear and informative.

Conclusion

The function AddGenesisAccountCmd has proper error handling and well-documented command flag descriptions.

• : The function AddGenesisAccountCmd includes proper error handling and well-documented command flag descriptions.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify proper error handling and command flag descriptions in `AddGenesisAccountCmd`.

# Test: Search for error handling patterns and flag descriptions in the function.
rg --type go $'AddGenesisAccountCmd' cmd/axoned/cmd/genaccount.go

Length of output: 226

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify proper error handling and command flag descriptions in `AddGenesisAccountCmd`.

# Test: Search for error handling patterns in the function.
rg --type go 'return fmt\.Errorf|return err' cmd/axoned/cmd/genaccount.go

# Test: Search for command flag descriptions in the function.
rg --type go 'cmd\.Flags\.' cmd/axoned/cmd/genaccount.go

Length of output: 237

x/vesting/module.go (2)

Line range hint 38-104: Review the implementation of AppModuleBasic methods for completeness and correctness.

---

Line range hint 88-146: Ensure correct use of keepers and implementation of module interfaces in AppModule.

Verification successful

---

The AppModule structure correctly extends AppModuleBasic and implements the necessary interfaces, including appmodule.AppModule and appmodule.HasServices. The keepers (accountKeeper and bankKeeper) are properly initialized in the NewAppModule constructor and used within the RegisterServices method. Additionally, all required methods for the implemented interfaces are present and correctly defined.

• The keepers are initialized in the NewAppModule function.
• The RegisterServices method uses the keepers to register the message server.
• The AppModule structure implements the necessary methods for the appmodule.AppModule interface.

Therefore, the implementation appears to be correct.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct use of keepers and implementation of module interfaces in `AppModule`.

# Test: Search for the use of keepers and module interfaces in the AppModule structure.
rg --type go $'AppModule' x/vesting/module.go

Length of output: 1696

proto/vesting/v1beta1/vesting.proto (3)

Line range hint 1-34: Review the Protobuf message definition for BaseVestingAccount for correctness of field definitions and options.

Verification successful

---

Verify the correctness of the BaseVestingAccount message definition

The extracted definition of the BaseVestingAccount message appears to be correct in terms of field definitions and Protobuf options. The fields and options are consistent with the expected structure for a vesting account.

• The base_account field is correctly embedded.
• The original_vesting, delegated_free, and delegated_vesting fields are correctly defined with appropriate options.

No issues were found in the provided snippet.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of field definitions and options in `BaseVestingAccount`.

# Test: Search for the `BaseVestingAccount` message definition in the Protobuf file.
rg --type proto $'BaseVestingAccount' proto/vesting/v1beta1/vesting.proto

Length of output: 102

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of field definitions and options in `BaseVestingAccount`.

# Test: Search for the `BaseVestingAccount` message definition in the Protobuf file.
rg --type-add 'proto:*.proto' 'BaseVestingAccount' proto/vesting/v1beta1/vesting.proto

Length of output: 621

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the full definition of the `BaseVestingAccount` message for detailed review.

# Test: Extract the full message definition for `BaseVestingAccount`.
rg --type-add 'proto:*.proto' -A 20 'message BaseVestingAccount' proto/vesting/v1beta1/vesting.proto

Length of output: 972

---

64-69: Ensure correct field definitions and options in the Period message.

Verification successful

---

Ensure correct field definitions and options in the Period message.

The Period message in the Protobuf file is defined as follows:

message Period {
  // Period duration in seconds.
  int64 length = 1;
  repeated cosmos.base.v1beta1.Coin amount = 2 [
    (gogoproto.nullable) = false,
    (amino.dont_omitempty) = true,
    (amino.encoding) = "legacy_coins",
    (gogoproto.castrepeated) = "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types.Coins"
  ];
}

• The length field is defined as an int64 representing the period duration in seconds.
• The amount field is a repeated field of type cosmos.base.v1beta1.Coin with several options:
  • (gogoproto.nullable) = false
  • (amino.dont_omitempty) = true
  • (amino.encoding) = "legacy_coins"
  • (gogoproto.castrepeated) = "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types.Coins"

These definitions and options appear to be correctly specified.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct field definitions and options in the `Period` message.

# Test: Search for the `Period` message definition in the Protobuf file.
rg --type proto $'Period' proto/vesting/v1beta1/vesting.proto

Length of output: 90

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct field definitions and options in the `Period` message.

# Test: Search for the `Period` message definition in the Protobuf file.
rg --type proto 'message Period' proto/vesting/v1beta1/vesting.proto

Length of output: 100

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct field definitions and options in the `Period` message.

# Test: Search for the `Period` message definition in the Protobuf file.
rg 'message Period' proto/vesting/v1beta1/vesting.proto

Length of output: 107

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the `Period` message definition and verify the fields and options.

# Test: Extract the `Period` message definition from the Protobuf file.
rg -A 10 'message Period {' proto/vesting/v1beta1/vesting.proto

Length of output: 161

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the `Period` message definition and verify the fields and options.

# Test: Extract the `Period` message definition from the Protobuf file.
rg -A 10 'message Period \{' proto/vesting/v1beta1/vesting.proto

Length of output: 375

---

111-111: Review the CliffVestingAccount message for correct field definitions and options.

Verification successful

---

Verification of CliffVestingAccount Message Definition

The CliffVestingAccount message in the Protobuf file is correctly defined with appropriate field definitions and options.

• The message includes the necessary options: (amino.name) and (gogoproto.goproto_getters).
• The fields base_vesting_account, start_time, and cliff_time are correctly defined with appropriate types and options.

No issues were found with the CliffVestingAccount message definition.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct field definitions and options in the `CliffVestingAccount` message.

# Test: Search for the `CliffVestingAccount` message definition in the Protobuf file.
rg --type proto $'CliffVestingAccount' proto/vesting/v1beta1/vesting.proto

Length of output: 103

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct field definitions and options in the `CliffVestingAccount` message.

# Test: Search for the `CliffVestingAccount` message definition in the Protobuf file.
rg 'message CliffVestingAccount' proto/vesting/v1beta1/vesting.proto

Length of output: 100

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the full definition of the `CliffVestingAccount` message.

# Test: Extract the `CliffVestingAccount` message definition from the Protobuf file.
rg -A 20 'message CliffVestingAccount' proto/vesting/v1beta1/vesting.proto

Length of output: 645

x/vesting/client/cli/tx_test.go (5)

54-140: The testing structure and execution in TestNewMsgCreateVestingAccountCmd are well-implemented and follow good practices.

---

142-232: The testing structure and execution in TestNewMsgCreateCliffVestingAccountCmd are correctly implemented for testing cliff vesting account creation.

---

234-311: The testing structure and execution in TestNewMsgCreatePermanentLockedAccountCmd are correctly implemented for testing permanent locked account creation.

---

313-371: The testing structure and execution in TestNewMsgCreatePeriodicVestingAccountCmd are correctly implemented for testing periodic vesting account creation.

---

30-52: The setup of the CLITestSuite is comprehensive and well-structured, providing a solid foundation for the tests.

cmd/axoned/cmd/root.go (1)

199-206: Custom add-genesis-account command reintroduced correctly.

docs/proto/vesting.md (3)

63-63: Documentation for cliff_time in CliffVestingAccount added correctly.

---

97-97: Documentation for length in Period added correctly.

---

153-153: Documentation for cliff_time in MsgCreateCliffVestingAccount added correctly.

Makefile (1)

322-322: Optimization of documentation generation process by limiting search depth implemented correctly.

x/vesting/msg_server_test.go (4)

80-123: The test scenarios for CreateVestingAccount are comprehensive and well-structured.

Also applies to: 141-155

---

213-230: The test scenarios for CreatePermanentLockedAccount are well-implemented and cover necessary edge cases.

Also applies to: 255-269

---

312-391: The test scenarios for CreatePeriodicVestingAccount are thorough and effectively validate the functionality.

Also applies to: 413-435

---

486-540: The test scenarios for CreateCliffVestingAccount are comprehensive and cover all critical edge cases.

Also applies to: 558-572

x/vesting/types/vesting_account.go (5)

30-39: The implementation and validation logic in BaseVestingAccount are correctly handled.

Also applies to: 152-164

---

186-198: The ContinuousVestingAccount is well-implemented with appropriate validation and utility methods.

---

283-301: The PeriodicVestingAccount implementation is robust, particularly the detailed validation logic for vesting periods.

Also applies to: 374-394

---

415-427: The DelayedVestingAccount is correctly implemented with appropriate validation and utility methods.

---

478-487: The PermanentLockedAccount is well-implemented, ensuring that no end time is set for permanently locked accounts.

x/vesting/types/vesting_account_test.go (6)

1-1: Ensure the nolint:lll directive is necessary.

Verification successful

---

Ensure the nolint:lll directive is necessary.

• The file x/vesting/types/vesting_account_test.go contains multiple lines exceeding typical length limits (100 characters), confirming the necessity of the nolint:lll directive.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the long line linting issue is prevalent in this file.

# Test: Search for lines exceeding typical length limits.
rg '.{100,}' x/vesting/types/vesting_account_test.go

Length of output: 6426

---

13-13: Added imports are appropriate for the new test functionalities.

---

47-47: The integration of runtime.NewKVStoreService and context setup with header.Info is correctly implemented.

Also applies to: 49-49, 62-62

---

76-77: The repeated pattern of creating vesting accounts and handling errors is consistent and correctly implemented across various test functions.

Also applies to: 101-102, 122-123, 146-147, 153-154, 160-161, 171-172, 187-188, 195-196, 203-204, 212-213, 235-236, 252-253, 270-271, 299-300, 306-307, 314-315, 321-322, 337-338, 345-346, 353-354, 362-363, 389-390, 424-425, 485-486, 523-524, 553-554, 560-561, 567-568, 575-576, 583-584, 594-595, 615-616, 623-624, 631-632, 639-640, 648-649, 671-672, 688-689, 706-707, 730-731, 737-738, 744-745, 760-761, 768-769, 776-777, 785-786, 803-804, 832-833, 858-859, 888-889, 933-934

---

424-424: The test for overflow and negative values in vesting periods is a good addition for robustness.

---

988-988: The tests for various account validations are well-structured and cover a broad range of scenarios.

Also applies to: 1012-1012, 1020-1020, 1028-1028, 1050-1050

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f076a84 and ba91548.

• proto/buf.yaml (1 hunks)

• proto/buf.yaml

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ba91548 and caca9a7.

• docs/command/axoned_genesis_add-genesis-account.md is excluded by !docs/command/**/*.md
• docs/command/axoned_tx_vesting_create-cliff-vesting-account.md is excluded by !docs/command/**/*.md
• docs/command/axoned_tx_vesting_create-periodic-vesting-account.md is excluded by !docs/command/**/*.md
• docs/proto/vesting.md is excluded by !docs/proto/**/*.md
• x/vesting/types/tx.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go
• x/vesting/types/vesting.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go

• .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
• Makefile (1 hunks)
• cmd/axoned/cmd/genaccount.go (1 hunks)
• cmd/axoned/cmd/genaccount_test.go (1 hunks)
• cmd/axoned/cmd/root.go (1 hunks)
• proto/buf.gen.doc.yml (1 hunks)
• proto/buf.yaml (1 hunks)
• proto/vesting/module/v1/module.proto (1 hunks)
• proto/vesting/v1beta1/tx.proto (4 hunks)
• proto/vesting/v1beta1/vesting.proto (6 hunks)
• scripts/protocgen-doc.sh (1 hunks)
• x/vesting/client/cli/test.json (1 hunks)
• x/vesting/client/cli/tx.go (14 hunks)
• x/vesting/client/cli/tx_test.go (1 hunks)
• x/vesting/module.go (5 hunks)
• x/vesting/msg_server.go (7 hunks)
• x/vesting/msg_server_test.go (14 hunks)
• x/vesting/types/codec.go (2 hunks)
• x/vesting/types/constants.go (1 hunks)
• x/vesting/types/genaccounts.go (1 hunks)
• x/vesting/types/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
• x/vesting/types/msgs.go (4 hunks)
• x/vesting/types/period.go (2 hunks)
• x/vesting/types/vesting_account.go (16 hunks)
• x/vesting/types/vesting_account_test.go (30 hunks)

• proto/vesting/v1beta1/vesting.proto (no review received)
• proto/vesting/v1beta1/tx.proto (no review received)
• x/vesting/types/genaccounts.go (no review received)
• x/vesting/client/cli/tx.go (no review received)
• x/vesting/msg_server.go (no review received)

• .github/workflows/test.yml
• proto/buf.gen.doc.yml
• proto/vesting/module/v1/module.proto
• x/vesting/client/cli/test.json
• x/vesting/types/msgs.go
• x/vesting/types/period.go

• proto/buf.yaml

x/vesting/types/constants.go (1)

Line range hint 1-9: Ensure that the removed constant AttributeValueCategory is not referenced elsewhere in the codebase.

Verification successful

---

The constant AttributeValueCategory has been successfully removed from the codebase and is not referenced elsewhere.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the removed constant `AttributeValueCategory` is not referenced elsewhere.

# Test: Search for the constant usage. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type go 'AttributeValueCategory'

Length of output: 37

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the constant `AttributeValueCategory` has been removed from `constants.go`.

# Test: Check the contents of `constants.go` for the presence of `AttributeValueCategory`.
rg 'AttributeValueCategory' x/vesting/types/constants.go

Length of output: 56

scripts/protocgen-doc.sh (1)

14-17: Optimization of documentation generation by limiting search depth is a good improvement.

x/vesting/types/genesis_test.go (1)

24-25: Introduction of NewBaseVestingAccount in tests aligns with the objective to enhance unit tests.

cmd/axoned/cmd/genaccount_test.go (1)

1-116: Introduction of new imports and the testMbm variable enhances the setup for testing AddGenesisAccountCmd.

cmd/axoned/cmd/genaccount.go (1)

33-104: Enhancement of AddGenesisAccountCmd with new vesting parameters improves flexibility in setting up genesis accounts.

x/vesting/module.go (2)

142-143: Ensure the ProvideModule function is covered by tests.

Tools

GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 142-143: x/vesting/module.go#L142-L143
Added lines #L142 - L143 were not covered by tests

---

98-98: Ensure the IsAppModule method is covered by tests.

Tools

GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 98-98: x/vesting/module.go#L98
Added line #L98 was not covered by tests

x/vesting/client/cli/tx_test.go (4)

54-140: The implementation of TestNewMsgCreateVestingAccountCmd correctly sets up and validates various scenarios for creating a vesting account. Good use of structured tests and error handling.

---

142-232: The implementation of TestNewMsgCreateCliffVestingAccountCmd correctly sets up and validates various scenarios for creating a cliff vesting account. Proper handling of command context and error expectations.

---

234-311: The implementation of TestNewMsgCreatePermanentLockedAccountCmd correctly sets up and validates various scenarios for creating a permanently locked vesting account. Proper handling of command context and error expectations.

---

313-371: The implementation of TestNewMsgCreatePeriodicVestingAccountCmd correctly sets up and validates various scenarios for creating a periodic vesting account. Proper handling of command context and error expectations.

cmd/axoned/cmd/root.go (1)

199-206: The modification to the genesisCommand function correctly removes the default add-genesis-account command and adds a custom command. This aligns with the PR's objectives to reintroduce the custom command with additional vesting parameters.

Makefile (1)

322-322: The modification to the doc-proto target in the Makefile correctly limits the search depth for .proto files, optimizing the documentation generation process. This aligns with the PR's objectives to improve the Proto Docs Generation.

x/vesting/msg_server_test.go (4)

80-123: Review error handling in TestCreateVestingAccount for robustness and clarity.

Verification successful

---

The error handling in TestCreateVestingAccount appears robust and clear, covering various failure scenarios with descriptive error messages.

• Invalid 'from' address
• Invalid 'to' address
• Invalid coins
• Invalid end time
• Already exists
• Not allowed to receive funds
• Invalid start time
• Invalid period
• Invalid cliff time

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that error messages are clear and cover all failure scenarios.
# Test: Search for error handling in `TestCreateVestingAccount`. Expect: Comprehensive and clear error messages.
rg --type go 'expErr' x/vesting/msg_server_test.go

Length of output: 2125

---

312-391: Ensure the handling of edge cases in TestCreatePeriodicVestingAccount is comprehensive.

Verification successful

---

The edge cases in TestCreatePeriodicVestingAccount appear to be comprehensive, covering various scenarios such as invalid addresses, invalid start time, invalid period, invalid coins, already existing accounts, and restrictions on receiving funds.

• Invalid 'from' address
• Invalid 'to' address
• Invalid start time
• Invalid period
• Invalid coins
• Already exists
• Not allowed to receive funds
• Invalid end time
• Invalid cliff time

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for comprehensive edge case handling in `TestCreatePeriodicVestingAccount`.
# Test: Search for edge case tests. Expect: Comprehensive coverage.
rg --type go 'expErr' x/vesting/msg_server_test.go

Length of output: 2125

---

51-51: Ensure the block header time is set correctly for all test scenarios.

Verification successful

---

The VestingTestSuite struct extends suite.Suite, which is part of the testify package. This package automatically calls the SetupTest method before each test case. The SetupTest method in VestingTestSuite sets the block header time correctly.

• The block header time is set in the SetupTest method.
• SetupTest is automatically called before each test case by the testify framework.

This ensures that the block header time is set correctly for all test scenarios.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the block header time is set correctly in all test scenarios.
# Test: Search for block header time setting. Expect: Consistent and correct usage across all tests.
rg --type go 'WithBlockHeader' x/vesting/msg_server_test.go

Length of output: 134

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Identify all test functions in the file to verify if they set the block header time.
# Test: Search for test functions. Expect: List of all test functions in the file.
rg --type go 'func Test' x/vesting/msg_server_test.go

Length of output: 97

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Inspect the structure of the TestVestingTestSuite function to verify the block header time setting in each test case.
# Test: Search for sub-tests or test cases within the TestVestingTestSuite function.
rg --type go 'TestVestingTestSuite' -A 50 x/vesting/msg_server_test.go

Length of output: 151

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the definition of VestingTestSuite and inspect its methods to verify the block header time setting.
# Test: Search for the definition of VestingTestSuite.
rg --type go 'type VestingTestSuite' -A 50 x/vesting/msg_server_test.go

Length of output: 1575

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if SetupTest is called before each test case in the VestingTestSuite.
# Test: Search for SetupTest calls in the VestingTestSuite.
rg --type go 'SetupTest' x/vesting/msg_server_test.go

Length of output: 94

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if suite.Suite is used and if it automatically calls SetupTest.
# Test: Search for suite.Suite usage in the VestingTestSuite.
rg --type go 'suite.Suite' x/vesting/msg_server_test.go

Length of output: 68

---

213-239: Validate input parameters thoroughly in TestCreatePermanentLockedAccount.

Verification successful

---

The test cases for MsgCreatePermanentLockedAccount in x/vesting/msg_server_test.go do validate various input parameters, including empty addresses and invalid coins. This indicates that input validation is being thoroughly tested.

• Empty 'from' address: Validates that an empty 'from' address results in an error.
• Empty 'to' address: Validates that an empty 'to' address results in an error.
• Invalid coins: Validates that invalid coin amounts result in an error.
• Create for existing account: Validates that creating an account for an existing address results in an error.
• Create for blocked account: Validates that creating an account for a blocked address results in an error.
• Valid permanent locked account: Validates that a valid account creation succeeds without errors.

These test cases cover a broad range of input validation scenarios, ensuring that the function handles invalid inputs appropriately.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Ensure all input parameters are validated correctly.
# Test: Search for input validation in `TestCreatePermanentLockedAccount`. Expect: Thorough validation for all inputs.
rg --type go 'input:' x/vesting/msg_server_test.go

Length of output: 1732

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the definition of `TestCreatePermanentLockedAccount` and extract relevant test cases to verify input validation.
# Step 1: Locate the `TestCreatePermanentLockedAccount` function definition.
rg --type go 'func TestCreatePermanentLockedAccount' x/vesting/msg_server_test.go

# Step 2: Extract the test cases within the `TestCreatePermanentLockedAccount` function to verify input validation.
rg --type go -A 20 'func TestCreatePermanentLockedAccount' x/vesting/msg_server_test.go

Length of output: 173

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for test cases related to `MsgCreatePermanentLockedAccount` and extract relevant sections to verify input validation.
# Step 1: Locate test cases for `MsgCreatePermanentLockedAccount`.
rg --type go 'MsgCreatePermanentLockedAccount' x/vesting/msg_server_test.go

# Step 2: Extract the relevant sections around the located test cases to verify input validation.
rg --type go -A 20 'MsgCreatePermanentLockedAccount' x/vesting/msg_server_test.go

Length of output: 3073

x/vesting/types/vesting_account.go (6)

415-427: Review the creation of DelayedVestingAccount for correctness.

---

30-39: Ensure that the NewBaseVestingAccount function initializes all fields correctly.

Verification successful

---

The NewBaseVestingAccount function initializes all fields of the BaseVestingAccount struct correctly. The fields BaseAccount, OriginalVesting, DelegatedFree, DelegatedVesting, and EndTime are all set during the initialization.

• BaseAccount is set to baseAccount.
• OriginalVesting is set to originalVesting.
• DelegatedFree is initialized with sdk.NewCoins().
• DelegatedVesting is initialized with sdk.NewCoins().
• EndTime is set to endTime.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all fields in `NewBaseVestingAccount` are initialized correctly.
# Test: Search for field initializations in `NewBaseVestingAccount`. Expect: Correct initialization for all fields.
rg --type go 'BaseVestingAccount{' x/vesting/types/vesting_account.go

Length of output: 173

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all fields in `NewBaseVestingAccount` are initialized correctly.
# Test: Search for field initializations in `NewBaseVestingAccount`. Expect: Correct initialization for all fields.
rg --type go 'BaseVestingAccount\s*{' x/vesting/types/vesting_account.go

Length of output: 182

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all fields in `NewBaseVestingAccount` are initialized correctly.
# Test: Search for field initializations in `NewBaseVestingAccount`. Expect: Correct initialization for all fields.
rg --type go 'BaseVestingAccount\s*{' x/vesting/types/vesting_account.go

Length of output: 182

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all fields in `NewBaseVestingAccount` are initialized correctly.
# Test: Search for the `NewBaseVestingAccount` function and extract its implementation.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func NewBaseVestingAccount($_, $_, $_) ($_ $_) {
  $$$
}' x/vesting/types/vesting_account.go

Length of output: 124

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all fields in `NewBaseVestingAccount` are initialized correctly.
# Test: Search for the `NewBaseVestingAccount` function definition and display its implementation.
rg 'func NewBaseVestingAccount' -A 10 x/vesting/types/vesting_account.go

Length of output: 489

---

Line range hint 543-568: Validate the creation and initialization of CliffVestingAccount.

Verification successful

---

The search results indicate that the CliffVestingAccount is being created and initialized in the NewCliffVestingAccount and NewCliffVestingAccountRaw functions. Let's review these functions to ensure they correctly initialize the CliffVestingAccount.

• NewCliffVestingAccountRaw:

  func NewCliffVestingAccountRaw(bva *BaseVestingAccount, startTime, cliffTime int64) *CliffVestingAccount {
      return &CliffVestingAccount{
          BaseVestingAccount: bva,
          StartTime:          startTime,
          CliffTime:          cliffTime,
      }
  }

  This function initializes a CliffVestingAccount with a BaseVestingAccount, startTime, and cliffTime. It appears to correctly set these fields.

• NewCliffVestingAccount:

  func NewCliffVestingAccount(baseAcc *authtypes.BaseAccount,
      originalVesting sdk.Coins,
      startTime, cliffTime, endTime int64,
  ) (*CliffVestingAccount, error) {
      baseVestingAcc := &BaseVestingAccount{
          BaseAccount:     baseAcc,
          OriginalVesting: originalVesting,
          EndTime:         endTime,
      }
  
      cliffVestingAccount := &CliffVestingAccount{
          StartTime:          startTime,
          CliffTime:          cliffTime,
          BaseVestingAccount: baseVestingAcc,
      }
  
      return cliffVestingAccount, cliffVestingAccount.Validate()
  }

  This function initializes a CliffVestingAccount with a BaseAccount, originalVesting, startTime, cliffTime, and endTime. It also validates the CliffVestingAccount before returning it.

Both functions appear to correctly initialize the CliffVestingAccount with the necessary fields. The NewCliffVestingAccount function also includes validation, which adds an extra layer of robustness.

Based on this review, the initialization logic for CliffVestingAccount seems correct and robust.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the creation and initialization of `CliffVestingAccount`.
# Test: Search for creation logic in `CliffVestingAccount`. Expect: Correct and robust initialization.
rg --type go 'CliffVestingAccount' x/vesting/types/vesting_account.go

Length of output: 1176

---

283-301: Check the calculation of endTime in NewPeriodicVestingAccount for accuracy.

Verification successful

---

The endTime calculation in the NewPeriodicVestingAccount function appears to be straightforward. It initializes endTime with startTime and then iteratively adds the length of each period in the periods slice. This logic seems correct for accumulating the total vesting period.

• The startTime is correctly initialized.
• Each period's length is correctly added to endTime.

No additional logic or edge cases affecting endTime were found in the provided context.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that `endTime` is calculated accurately in `NewPeriodicVestingAccount`.
# Test: Search for `endTime` calculation. Expect: Accurate calculation.
rg --type go 'endTime' x/vesting/types/vesting_account.go

Length of output: 655

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the full implementation of the NewPeriodicVestingAccount function to verify the calculation of endTime.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewPeriodicVestingAccount($_, $_, $_, $_) (*PeriodicVestingAccount, error) {
  $$$
}' x/vesting/types/vesting_account.go

Length of output: 1696

---

374-394: Ensure that the validation logic in PeriodicVestingAccount.Validate is comprehensive.

Verification successful

Let's review the full implementation of the PeriodicVestingAccount.Validate and BaseVestingAccount.Validate methods to ensure comprehensive validation.

---

The PeriodicVestingAccount.Validate method includes comprehensive validation logic specific to PeriodicVestingAccount, such as checking the start and end times, validating each vesting period's length and amount, and ensuring the cumulative end time and original vesting amounts are correct. Additionally, it calls the BaseVestingAccount.Validate method, which further validates the end time, original vesting, and delegated vesting amounts.

The validation logic appears to be thorough and covers various potential issues.

• : The validation logic in PeriodicVestingAccount.Validate is comprehensive and includes checks for start and end times, vesting periods, and original vesting amounts. Additionally, it calls the BaseVestingAccount.Validate method for further validation.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for comprehensive validation logic in `PeriodicVestingAccount.Validate`.
# Test: Search for validation logic. Expect: Comprehensive coverage.
rg --type go 'Validate' x/vesting/types/vesting_account.go

Length of output: 1319

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Retrieve the full implementation of the `PeriodicVestingAccount.Validate` method.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (pva PeriodicVestingAccount) Validate() error { $$$ }'

# Retrieve the full implementation of the `BaseVestingAccount.Validate` method.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (bva BaseVestingAccount) Validate() error { $$$ }'

Length of output: 3615

---

152-164: Validate error handling in BaseVestingAccount.Validate.

x/vesting/types/vesting_account_test.go (4)

13-13: New import added for cosmossdk.io/core/header.

This import is necessary for the updated context handling in the tests.

---

47-49: Updated context handling in test setup.

The context now includes header information, which is crucial for tests that may depend on block headers.

---

76-77: Extensive use of types.New*VestingAccount across various test functions.

These changes are consistent with the PR's objective to enhance the vesting module's functionality and robustness. The error handling with require.NoError ensures that the tests will fail fast if the account creation does not proceed as expected.

Also applies to: 101-102, 122-123, 146-147, 153-154, 160-161, 171-172, 187-188, 195-196, 203-204, 212-213, 235-236, 252-253, 270-271, 299-300, 306-307, 314-315, 321-322, 337-338, 345-346, 353-354, 362-363, 389-390, 424-473, 485-486, 523-524, 553-554, 560-561, 567-568, 575-576, 583-584, 594-595, 615-616, 623-624, 631-632, 639-640, 648-649, 671-672, 688-689, 706-707, 730-731, 737-738, 744-745, 760-761, 768-769, 776-777, 785-786, 802-803, 832-833, 858-859, 888-889, 933-934

---

988-989: Enhanced validation tests for various account types.

The tests now cover a broader range of scenarios, including edge cases for vesting times and amounts. This is crucial for ensuring the robustness of the vesting logic.

Also applies to: 1012-1015, 1020-1023, 1028-1031, 1050-1053